The strongest argument I've read underlining the absurdity of transwomen (men, originally) competing against women in sports, and yet the Olympics are allowing some of these transwomen to represent women in their chosen activities. Women are not a sub-category but one half of the fundamental division of human beings, and transwomen should only compete against other transwomen.
Every advancement of gender ideology makes my blood boil (more). But comes with a painful benefit: this movement has sailed so far due to obscurity from the general public, such advancements reveal it to mainstream attention. Hence make opposition more possible.
What a slip I made when putting 'men originally' into my comment! 'Modified men' is a more accurate description, though never modified to the point where they lose their
The strongest argument I've read underlining the absurdity of transwomen (men, originally) competing against women in sports, and yet the Olympics are allowing some of these transwomen to represent women in their chosen activities. Women are not a sub-category but one half of the fundamental division of human beings, and transwomen should only compete against other transwomen.
Agreed Bill - but they are men and remain men - no originally about it.
Every advancement of gender ideology makes my blood boil (more). But comes with a painful benefit: this movement has sailed so far due to obscurity from the general public, such advancements reveal it to mainstream attention. Hence make opposition more possible.
What a slip I made when putting 'men originally' into my comment! 'Modified men' is a more accurate description, though never modified to the point where they lose their
sex-based, physical advantages.
When women whined and complained for equality for decades and then get a taste of it, this is what happens.