The Disturbing Case of "Princess Aurora"

*Content Warning*

An adult man who identifies as a young girl has been creating disturbing pornographic content of himself in dresses and diapers while using a face filter which makes him resemble a child.

On social media he uses the moniker “Princess Aurora,” where he has amassed a following of over 5k and regularly receives supportive comments from other men who identify as either transgender or as crossdressers.

“Aurora” began uploading digitally-altered images of himself dressed as an underage girl in 2021, wearing a Western Maryland high school cheerleader uniform. More recent photos show the man wearing wigs and frilly pink underwear and diapers.

In several of the images, “Aurora” is posed on a bed decorated with a Disney princess comforter, often holding children’s toys. In many cases, he exposes his adult genitalia while posing as a child.

“Sissy needs something to suck on,” reads the caption of a series of photos of the adult male “Aurora” with a pacifier in his mouth. In another caption on a photo titled “Girly Excitement,” in which his erection can be seen through the pink underwear, the man admits that he always becomes “a lil excited when wearing girly clothes.”

“Aurora” is a participant in over 100 pornographic groups on Flickr, where he shares his photos, that involve themes of transgenderism, age regression fetishes, and sissification. Group names include, “Forced to Become an Adult Baby,” “Boys Dressed as Girls,” “Slutty Crossdresser & T-girl,” “Adult Littles at Play,” and “TGs with Bodies or Face like GGs”.
(TG = transgender, GG = “genetic girl”)

Comments from his (entirely male) supporters are extremely sexually explicit, with one user remarking that he would enjoy castrating “Aurora” and keeping him as a “sissy slave.”

“Aurora” also operates an OnlyFans account which features pornographic content of himself made to look like a young girl, at times decked in Disney princess costumes. He describes himself as a “crossdresser sissy trans femboy princess,” and promises subscribers “lots of sissy stuff, of course also naughty and XXX” content.

“I would like to show you my transition photos from a normal guy to a magical fairygirl and it would be lovely finding a few supporters who wanna help me achieving [sic] my goals of becoming more and more the princess of my dreams,” states his bio.

Although I have reported his profile, which I am not linking in this article, I do not expect any action will be taken, particularly since the man behind the images is over the age of 18.

Perhaps the most troubling aspect of this situation is the question of how many men are using face filters to make pornography of themselves intended to resemble women or children.

While AI has been rightly criticized for allowing the creation of sexually abusive content, far less frequently discussed is the ability for men to digitally become their own favorite porn genre - and how far they may go to replicate, either on themselves or on others, what they act out on the screen.

It is my observation that it is impossible to separate the concept and contagion of “gender identity” from pornography.

Sissification and forced feminization content encourages male viewers to “become the girl” and to begin taking estrogen to “shrink” the penis into a “little clitty.” By the time a man has committed to acting out his sexual fetish full-time as a lifestyle, he has already, more often than not, consumed a significant amount of pornography and feels a need to incorporate exhibitionism to keep up the thrill.

Feminists who have criticized pornography have been told by detractors that the media merely reflects fantasies, and therefore, it is implied, have no effect whatsoever on reality. If this were true, it would uniquely place pornography as the only form of media to exist in a vacuum - despite its incorporation of real, living humans in its production. Fantasies exist within the mind; pornography is both an industry and a form of media, produced for profit.

Claims of “free speech” and “fantasies” fly in the face of decades of research showing a correlation between pornography consumption and harmful attitudes and behaviors towards women. Additionally, in order to believe that pornography has no impact on behavior or self-perception, one must necessarily ignore the testimonies of sexually violent criminals, as well as survivors of sexual abuse.

One argument that has long been missing from the feminist critique of pornography, focused as it has been on the dangers to women and children, is its apparent capacity to erode the male psyche - for who could have ever imagined that access to streaming pornography would motivate men to modify their bodies in an effort to more closely resemble their preferred adult genre? Who could have guessed that pornography would cause men to lay claim to a “girl cock,” attempt to simulate lactation, or to demand access to spaces set aside for women’s safety as a “human right”?

The current reality we find ourselves in is one where there are adult men pretending to be children and performing sexual acts for an audience of men who pretend to be women. The case of “Princess Aurora” makes that clear — as does the advocacy done by Dr. Christina Richards, of the Gender Identity Clinic at Tavistock. According to Richards, a male who identifies as a woman, “age play,” or pretending to be a child during sexual encounters, is a valid form of sexuality.

“Terms which may be encountered here include daddy’s little girl (DLG) in which an older male top treats a younger female bottom as a nurtured child,” Richard elaborates. “The term ‘sissification’ intersects with age play as it is where an adult male is consensually ‘forced’ to don the clothes of, and behave as, a young girl as part of a BDSM scene. The humiliation the adult male feels at being dressed as a young female is the source of the eroticisation.”

To the trained eye, transgenderism and age regression, or the sexualization of children, are inextricably linked — the castration fetish inherent in both hints at this. Thus the implications of a movement which advocates for halting children’s puberty are horrifying to comprehend, especially in the context of how successful it has been in achieving its aims.