My God. To equate the normal and biologically driven desire of most women to have babies and care for them with sexual lust for the babies and the care of them requires an incomprehensible level of evil and mental gymnastics. The response your work is very telling. The creep to normalising child rape is palpable.
OMG is right. Just noticed too how Ms. Levitan says "people who are attracted to children" or "romantically attracted to children" which conveniently avoids saying "adults (mostly male) who are sexually attracted to children" which is still a way to avoid saying the reality behind it, that is, people (adult males) who are inappropriately attracted to children with the aim of grooming them then sexually abusing them for their own personal gratification. Hadn't even gotten far into the article and I was already so livid I had to leave a comment!
Sorry, another thought... Levitan is soliciting comments from "child lover" chats, et al., who are adults of course, who would claim that children should be free agents to become sexually involved with adults. If that's so, why doesn't she go onto teen and pre-teen chat boards to solicit comment from all the children who may be frustrated in their search for adult sexual partners... because she knows and her research subjects know full well that the idea that children really want sex with adults is grotesque and preposterous.
Holy F*ck. I can't even imagine how you are able to research this stuff. But truly this is the study that will be used by gov. agencies to allow this cohort to be accepted as part of the Alphabet army and then allow this to flourish in schools etc. As for the hit back at you, they are already seeding discrediting you in the search engines so people don't take you seriously. It is some nasty crap that they are saying about you, which is no surprise considering how truly and deeply nasty these adults are and what they are gunning for. I and so many admire all you do. It is your early podcast that brought me into this movement to protect women, girls and children. Stay strong. Thank YOU.
*nothing says motherly instinct like men who refer to it as "titty sucking and diapering". That response to your work is just unveiled misogyny. The researcher you portrayed is more likely the person with problems related to identifying their own female impulses and feelings associated with our biology and possibly a person projects her sympathy for herself on to others who she may deem misunderstood. This reflects a lack of self knowledge, often when we don't know ourselves we find others more interesting.
The unhinged sexual fantasies from those critics are remarkably nasty. As for her approach to infant rape and the abuse class, and her idiotic use of the phrase “in love with”, that’s wholly unethical.
Shared. Too many adults have been gleefully supporting the specialization of children. This is one further step towards changing laws to support psychologically damaging minors.
Still way before finishing the article, just wanted to say thank you, Genevieve, for all you do. You are a champion for children. The haters are going to hate, and lie, but you and we know who and what they really are. Many of us out here support you and your work whole-heartedly.
That is some deeply disturbed thinking on public display there. I feel like I need a bath after reading this, and it doesn’t even refer to me personally, as it does you. 🤢 Do continue to take good care of yourself, as the work you are doing on behalf of women and children is invaluable. ☮️❤️🐾
I’m sick to my stomach after reading this. Absolutely sick and disgusted. These people are not only sick in the head, they are evil. I have not one drop of compassion for anyone who goes along with this sick style of harm to a child. To agree with such an evil act is wrong no matter how or why they want to justify it. Please save our children! Mutilating their bodies in the name of transgender and sexually abusing their bodies in the name of “minor attraction” is nothing short of tragic. Shame on every person who feels it’s acceptable.
Thank you so much for this post. Of course the increase in power with het men identifying as Lesbians and women and their massive funding will resuscitate this horrific preying on children, like with the disgusting drag queen con. Lesbians fought against NAMBLA ("North American Man-Boy Love Association") marching in the Lesbian and Gay Parades for decades, but here it is again.
So who is this Julia Levitan? Not a man posing as woman? A true collaborator? If she is still working on a PhD, why does she have so much power to do this?
It's been over 25 years, but this is one conversation that I'll never forget. My FIL was telling us about a new guy at work, everyone knew he had just gotten out of jail for sexual interference with a minor. My FIL was wondering what made a guy like that tick, and struck up a conversation with him. He, along with the rest of us, was absolutely horrified to learn that this guy thought that what he had was completely normal, and that everybody else just didn't want to admit it. These men cannot be fixed. They need to be locked up.
My God. To equate the normal and biologically driven desire of most women to have babies and care for them with sexual lust for the babies and the care of them requires an incomprehensible level of evil and mental gymnastics. The response your work is very telling. The creep to normalising child rape is palpable.
OMG is right. Just noticed too how Ms. Levitan says "people who are attracted to children" or "romantically attracted to children" which conveniently avoids saying "adults (mostly male) who are sexually attracted to children" which is still a way to avoid saying the reality behind it, that is, people (adult males) who are inappropriately attracted to children with the aim of grooming them then sexually abusing them for their own personal gratification. Hadn't even gotten far into the article and I was already so livid I had to leave a comment!
Sorry, another thought... Levitan is soliciting comments from "child lover" chats, et al., who are adults of course, who would claim that children should be free agents to become sexually involved with adults. If that's so, why doesn't she go onto teen and pre-teen chat boards to solicit comment from all the children who may be frustrated in their search for adult sexual partners... because she knows and her research subjects know full well that the idea that children really want sex with adults is grotesque and preposterous.
Holy F*ck. I can't even imagine how you are able to research this stuff. But truly this is the study that will be used by gov. agencies to allow this cohort to be accepted as part of the Alphabet army and then allow this to flourish in schools etc. As for the hit back at you, they are already seeding discrediting you in the search engines so people don't take you seriously. It is some nasty crap that they are saying about you, which is no surprise considering how truly and deeply nasty these adults are and what they are gunning for. I and so many admire all you do. It is your early podcast that brought me into this movement to protect women, girls and children. Stay strong. Thank YOU.
Thank you Genevieve. This is "evil".
Please contact McGill's psychology department and question the study.
https://www.facebook.com/McGillPsychologyDept
*nothing says motherly instinct like men who refer to it as "titty sucking and diapering". That response to your work is just unveiled misogyny. The researcher you portrayed is more likely the person with problems related to identifying their own female impulses and feelings associated with our biology and possibly a person projects her sympathy for herself on to others who she may deem misunderstood. This reflects a lack of self knowledge, often when we don't know ourselves we find others more interesting.
The unhinged sexual fantasies from those critics are remarkably nasty. As for her approach to infant rape and the abuse class, and her idiotic use of the phrase “in love with”, that’s wholly unethical.
A bunch of projecting pedophile sadomasochists use waaay too many words to accuse you of just being mommy-brained for calling them out on their act.
Shared. Too many adults have been gleefully supporting the specialization of children. This is one further step towards changing laws to support psychologically damaging minors.
*sexualization...autocorrect
Wow. That’s all I got - Wow.
Still way before finishing the article, just wanted to say thank you, Genevieve, for all you do. You are a champion for children. The haters are going to hate, and lie, but you and we know who and what they really are. Many of us out here support you and your work whole-heartedly.
That is some deeply disturbed thinking on public display there. I feel like I need a bath after reading this, and it doesn’t even refer to me personally, as it does you. 🤢 Do continue to take good care of yourself, as the work you are doing on behalf of women and children is invaluable. ☮️❤️🐾
Thank You Ms. Gluck for fighting this Good Fight!
I’m sick to my stomach after reading this. Absolutely sick and disgusted. These people are not only sick in the head, they are evil. I have not one drop of compassion for anyone who goes along with this sick style of harm to a child. To agree with such an evil act is wrong no matter how or why they want to justify it. Please save our children! Mutilating their bodies in the name of transgender and sexually abusing their bodies in the name of “minor attraction” is nothing short of tragic. Shame on every person who feels it’s acceptable.
Thank you for exposing these dangerous men, and all the dangerous men and female coconspirators, in your work
God, these freaks.
Thank you so much for this post. Of course the increase in power with het men identifying as Lesbians and women and their massive funding will resuscitate this horrific preying on children, like with the disgusting drag queen con. Lesbians fought against NAMBLA ("North American Man-Boy Love Association") marching in the Lesbian and Gay Parades for decades, but here it is again.
So who is this Julia Levitan? Not a man posing as woman? A true collaborator? If she is still working on a PhD, why does she have so much power to do this?
It's been over 25 years, but this is one conversation that I'll never forget. My FIL was telling us about a new guy at work, everyone knew he had just gotten out of jail for sexual interference with a minor. My FIL was wondering what made a guy like that tick, and struck up a conversation with him. He, along with the rest of us, was absolutely horrified to learn that this guy thought that what he had was completely normal, and that everybody else just didn't want to admit it. These men cannot be fixed. They need to be locked up.