A leading academic journal has published an article questioning the need for age of consent laws and claiming that discussions of “youth sexuality” are unjustly hindered by “cancel culture.” The author, Marshall Burns, is a physicist and technology entrepreneur who was involved in the development of the early computer industry and operates a website titled “Consenting Juveniles.”
Even a child who thinks they’ve consented has not. They don’t have the maturity. Period. It fucks them up even if there are no cuts or bruises. It’s a violation against their innocence and dignity. I lost my virginity at 13 to a 23 year old and thought I was so cool. Looking back now, at 54, it’s horrific and heartbreaking. There is no way around the connection between trans kids and the sexualization of children. People can pretend all they want that we have to “protect trans kids” but in reality they’re protecting predators who ruin children for profit and sport.
Here's the thing, Robert. I used to be sixteen. I used to come on to men. Now I'm 54. Now I can see with clear and wise eyes that the sexualization and sexual abuse I endured as a child very directly led me to equate my self-worth with sexual attention. But just because I engaged in underage sex, starting at age thirteen mind you, does not mean it was not damaging. The fact that so many girls are actively seeking sex is not an indication that it's all good and peachy. Quite the reverse. Girls all over the western world have been manipulated by the hyper-sexualized culture to think promiscuity is a credit to their empowerment, when really it degrades and undermines them at every turn. And no you do not get a medal for turning down the opportunity to have sex with a sixteen year old. That's after all what you're supposed to do when you have any kind of moral integrity.
Perverted people with perverted views do not an argument make! Blaming feminists for protecting children from sex with adults and calling it cancel culture is just sick. Children cannot consent. Children are not sexual beings - this is classic transferance by paedophiles. All these so-called studies are from the point of view of the adult abuser, none of them seem to take into account the view of the abused child. How about those innocent children in all those pornogrpahic images? Did they consent to their image being traded? There is no such thing as a harmless paedophile.
Not only sick, but ridiculous. These multi degree holding "academics" are attempting to obscure the irrefutable fact that protecting children from sexual experiences with adults is as old as humanity itself. It predates feminism by literally thousands of years.
Communities used to deal appropriately with these sorts by subjecting them to "rough music".
Nowhere do any of these "researchers" look at consent. How does a child consent to something outside its Ken? It might be enjoyable but there is no consent the younger you go. It is a huge power imbalance and abuse of power by the adult which makes this so wrong. Why should men get what they want all the time? I have worked with both male and female child sex abuse survivors and none have sought out sex as children and all have been damaged in some way by the encounters. These researchers are twisted so their research becomes non viable as it simply reflects their own views
As horrifying as this content is, thank you for shining a bright light on it for rational people to be informed. Ms. PRITzker, as some will know, began as a gent and is the cousin of the governor of IL. That's pretty close to the levers of gov't powers. That's also totally nerve-wracking. I'm sorry that the author, in the course of her research, has to be exposed to this. It must be hard to see the good in the world after knowing these atrocities....
all trans generational paedophilia involves exploitation, the child being used as an object by adults usually incapable of democratic adult relations, due to their preference for sadomasochistic involvement with minors. however much this is dressed up as kink shaming, the childs position is usually one were they are a reminder of the paedophiles own childhood and the wish to sexualise dominate and control that reminder often cruelly is core.
Genevieve thank you so much for all the wonderful work you do to expose these unbelievably entitled creeps. What a sense of impunity they exhibit- and get away with. Whoever hired that guy to survey the foster kids should be fired. Like they wouldn't know that a repeatedly published pedophile advocate was a danger to kids!?! B. S.!
Oh and there's Pritzker in red! He doesn't look like he could harm a fly as his billions disrupt children's and young people's safety worldwide with gender confusion education funded by his Tawani charity. It is just rotten to learn "they really are coming for the kids". Thank you for you work @Genevieve Gluck.
I’d love a sort of quick reference guide on prominent trans movement leaders and their connections to pedophilia. What I find trying to explain this to trans-aligned people is their attention spans are too short to engage with more complex information about the connection.
I had an article in the special issue on cancel culture to which Mr. Burns wrote this response letter.
I've sent the following query to the journal editor, Ken Zucker, who was among the very few Canadian academics to reach out supportively when I was "cancelled" for terfery. I remain grateful to him, and he's been through probably the very worst "cancellation" of a Canadian academic by trans activists. If he allows me to do so, I will share his reply here:
>>I'm trying to understand the decision to include a missive from convicted child sex offender Marshall Burns among the responses to the cancel culture issue -- he laments how easily advocates of child sex abuse are also "cancelled" when they attempt their advocacy.
Is the motivation just not wanting to be hypocritical? Would a letter from an advocate of sexually motivated human cannibalism be included on those grounds? An advocate for sexually motivated serial killing? If so, fair enough! I mean these behaviors do fall within the remit of "sexual behavior" and thus the research focus of the journal.
But, if not: what exactly were the grounds for inclusion?>>
Thank you for your reply I guess it’s my difficulty processing such insanity, I apologise for questioning your research. It is my view that much of the attack on differences both generational and also gender has an underlying theme of paedophilic intentionality.
It's okay, and sorry if I came off a tad defensive - the incredulity is a common issue I encounter that I suspect holds a lot of people back from believing some of the darker aspects of this 'movement'
Thanks for all of your work. In my collection of data from 52 trans widows, I've tallied that over 1/3 of us experienced sexual assault and 1/5 of us were physically assaulted before leaving a suddenly "female identifying" man. These Jennifer (formerly James) Pritzger types have very warped views on their own childhoods, their manufactured childhood memories and their fantasies of children never growing up, but engaging in adult behaviors. The power they've accumulated is hard to fully understand.
I thought it was the men that drafted the "International Bill of Gender Rights" that coined "gender identity". May I ask what year Money coined this phrase?
I'm confused as to why it is you might think I would risk my reputation to publish something I hadn't personally spent time - in this case, several days - verifying myself first. Sorry to say that this seems to be the tip of the iceberg, and I know it's a lot to process. I'm currently knee-deep in something related that looks to be much worse. As ever, I'm very careful in order to avoid defamation.
It might be well to write about the skepticism and your process. Normal people intuitively turn away from distasteful and unpleasant circumstances. As a teacher who had to report a big incest case, I know. I can't believe how the educational complex is ignoring the child safeguarding that we were all trained in years ago. I fear that some schools will miss cases of physical and sexual abuse, possibly endangering a child's very life, because they immediately "affirm" a child's cross-sex ideation, when it could be a coping response to very seriously injurious abuse.
Even a child who thinks they’ve consented has not. They don’t have the maturity. Period. It fucks them up even if there are no cuts or bruises. It’s a violation against their innocence and dignity. I lost my virginity at 13 to a 23 year old and thought I was so cool. Looking back now, at 54, it’s horrific and heartbreaking. There is no way around the connection between trans kids and the sexualization of children. People can pretend all they want that we have to “protect trans kids” but in reality they’re protecting predators who ruin children for profit and sport.
Yeah, um, no.
Well I guess you're cleared now to fuck teenage girls. The stats are on your side. How convenient for you.
Here's the thing, Robert. I used to be sixteen. I used to come on to men. Now I'm 54. Now I can see with clear and wise eyes that the sexualization and sexual abuse I endured as a child very directly led me to equate my self-worth with sexual attention. But just because I engaged in underage sex, starting at age thirteen mind you, does not mean it was not damaging. The fact that so many girls are actively seeking sex is not an indication that it's all good and peachy. Quite the reverse. Girls all over the western world have been manipulated by the hyper-sexualized culture to think promiscuity is a credit to their empowerment, when really it degrades and undermines them at every turn. And no you do not get a medal for turning down the opportunity to have sex with a sixteen year old. That's after all what you're supposed to do when you have any kind of moral integrity.
Perverted people with perverted views do not an argument make! Blaming feminists for protecting children from sex with adults and calling it cancel culture is just sick. Children cannot consent. Children are not sexual beings - this is classic transferance by paedophiles. All these so-called studies are from the point of view of the adult abuser, none of them seem to take into account the view of the abused child. How about those innocent children in all those pornogrpahic images? Did they consent to their image being traded? There is no such thing as a harmless paedophile.
Not only sick, but ridiculous. These multi degree holding "academics" are attempting to obscure the irrefutable fact that protecting children from sexual experiences with adults is as old as humanity itself. It predates feminism by literally thousands of years.
Communities used to deal appropriately with these sorts by subjecting them to "rough music".
Nowhere do any of these "researchers" look at consent. How does a child consent to something outside its Ken? It might be enjoyable but there is no consent the younger you go. It is a huge power imbalance and abuse of power by the adult which makes this so wrong. Why should men get what they want all the time? I have worked with both male and female child sex abuse survivors and none have sought out sex as children and all have been damaged in some way by the encounters. These researchers are twisted so their research becomes non viable as it simply reflects their own views
SICK BASTARDS
As horrifying as this content is, thank you for shining a bright light on it for rational people to be informed. Ms. PRITzker, as some will know, began as a gent and is the cousin of the governor of IL. That's pretty close to the levers of gov't powers. That's also totally nerve-wracking. I'm sorry that the author, in the course of her research, has to be exposed to this. It must be hard to see the good in the world after knowing these atrocities....
all trans generational paedophilia involves exploitation, the child being used as an object by adults usually incapable of democratic adult relations, due to their preference for sadomasochistic involvement with minors. however much this is dressed up as kink shaming, the childs position is usually one were they are a reminder of the paedophiles own childhood and the wish to sexualise dominate and control that reminder often cruelly is core.
Genevieve thank you so much for all the wonderful work you do to expose these unbelievably entitled creeps. What a sense of impunity they exhibit- and get away with. Whoever hired that guy to survey the foster kids should be fired. Like they wouldn't know that a repeatedly published pedophile advocate was a danger to kids!?! B. S.!
Oh and there's Pritzker in red! He doesn't look like he could harm a fly as his billions disrupt children's and young people's safety worldwide with gender confusion education funded by his Tawani charity. It is just rotten to learn "they really are coming for the kids". Thank you for you work @Genevieve Gluck.
I’d love a sort of quick reference guide on prominent trans movement leaders and their connections to pedophilia. What I find trying to explain this to trans-aligned people is their attention spans are too short to engage with more complex information about the connection.
I had an article in the special issue on cancel culture to which Mr. Burns wrote this response letter.
I've sent the following query to the journal editor, Ken Zucker, who was among the very few Canadian academics to reach out supportively when I was "cancelled" for terfery. I remain grateful to him, and he's been through probably the very worst "cancellation" of a Canadian academic by trans activists. If he allows me to do so, I will share his reply here:
>>I'm trying to understand the decision to include a missive from convicted child sex offender Marshall Burns among the responses to the cancel culture issue -- he laments how easily advocates of child sex abuse are also "cancelled" when they attempt their advocacy.
https://substack.com/inbox/post/136550555
Is the motivation just not wanting to be hypocritical? Would a letter from an advocate of sexually motivated human cannibalism be included on those grounds? An advocate for sexually motivated serial killing? If so, fair enough! I mean these behaviors do fall within the remit of "sexual behavior" and thus the research focus of the journal.
But, if not: what exactly were the grounds for inclusion?>>
Ugh! Stanley was the convicted child sex offender, not Burns. My misreading.
Thank you for your reply I guess it’s my difficulty processing such insanity, I apologise for questioning your research. It is my view that much of the attack on differences both generational and also gender has an underlying theme of paedophilic intentionality.
It's okay, and sorry if I came off a tad defensive - the incredulity is a common issue I encounter that I suspect holds a lot of people back from believing some of the darker aspects of this 'movement'
Thanks for all of your work. In my collection of data from 52 trans widows, I've tallied that over 1/3 of us experienced sexual assault and 1/5 of us were physically assaulted before leaving a suddenly "female identifying" man. These Jennifer (formerly James) Pritzger types have very warped views on their own childhoods, their manufactured childhood memories and their fantasies of children never growing up, but engaging in adult behaviors. The power they've accumulated is hard to fully understand.
What is the logical bottom to this slope?
thank you genevieve. you are so needed. you are such a strong clear voiced truth teller.
I thought it was the men that drafted the "International Bill of Gender Rights" that coined "gender identity". May I ask what year Money coined this phrase?
can we verify this is genuine by the way it just feels so perverse?
I'm confused as to why it is you might think I would risk my reputation to publish something I hadn't personally spent time - in this case, several days - verifying myself first. Sorry to say that this seems to be the tip of the iceberg, and I know it's a lot to process. I'm currently knee-deep in something related that looks to be much worse. As ever, I'm very careful in order to avoid defamation.
It might be well to write about the skepticism and your process. Normal people intuitively turn away from distasteful and unpleasant circumstances. As a teacher who had to report a big incest case, I know. I can't believe how the educational complex is ignoring the child safeguarding that we were all trained in years ago. I fear that some schools will miss cases of physical and sexual abuse, possibly endangering a child's very life, because they immediately "affirm" a child's cross-sex ideation, when it could be a coping response to very seriously injurious abuse.