Horrifying and yet not the least bit surprising. Expanding the LGB moniker to add in the TQ and the all-important "+" at the end, which leaves room for multiple other "identities", was an essential first step in smuggling paedophilia in.
No wonder they had to downgrade the term gay and bring back, but rehabilitate, the term "queer", because, while mimicking acceptable sexual orientation diversity, it covertly embraces an infinite range of dangerous perversions that most gay and straight people abhor.
When you let insanity walk through the door (by pretending that men can be women and that confected "identity" matters more than reality) you leave room for all manner of depravity to follow, all justified by "queer theory".
No, Jenny, the word "queer" is not being popularized in an effort to rehabilitate an expression that is and always has been hate speech labeling gay and lesbian people. For those of us who can remember before 1990, it's up there with The N Word in hate speech. The current purpose is to normalize all sorts of behaviors and confuse the public, a classic move for propaganda. It is, in fact, entirely undefined. It's available to anyone who feels the need for the social cachet of being a member of an "oppressed' group. All you need to do is claim it. I get the impression at least half the NPR staff has done so, to judge from the frequency of stories about "queer" something or other. You might make your claim more vivid by painting your fingernails black or some poisonous green, nothing more required.
Couldn’t agree more, it’s a hateful word, but sadly now heard routinely, while the word gay is very rarely heard. Gay is verging on heretical as far as the gender Taliban are concerned, because it (correctly) assumes the reality of same-sex attraction, as opposed to the absurd concept of same-gender attraction. The gender ideologues seek to erase biological sex, and biological reality in general, hence their love for the term “queer” which is amorphous enough to stretch to fit anything.
I commend you for writing this piece to alert us. It was rather painful to hit the little heart icon, though. I wish there was an icon that denoted feeling nauseous. That is how I actually feel, that and outrage. I cannot fathom this actually being on the table, so to speak, to legitimize in any way.
It is like making rape legal..is that the next step?And then the justification for legalizing rape : “ Women enjoy it” ..as someone on Substack actually said in a post!🤮🤮
flood men with decades of pornography depicting abject violence as erotic and all barriers to the reality of harm get blinded by the grand finale cum shot to women's rights.
Thoroughly nauseating and another reason to never ignore the instinct of many women that the whole subject elicits: danger. Perhaps that's part of why erasing actual women and colonising womanhood is so important to these people. Divide and conquer. Make us voiceless and outside of acceptable so that our "dangerous agenda" (ha!) can be easily exterminated.
It was hard to read all of that! I kept thinking of my beautiful almost 10 year old granddaughter and wishing these people were taken out of circulation and put somewhere where they couldn’t abuse young children! My disgust and hatred of these men has no bounds.
Question here, are we assuming the minors are able to consent? Or hear me out, is the goal pf puberty blockers really to create the perpetual child like adult for the “MAPS” or I still like peodos.
Seriously though by normalizing this paraphilia, will children be able to see danger and exploitation? Will child safe quarding be impossible?
These men are exposing themselves(Ha! ) for what they are !why are they not warned that if they engage in their disgusting behavior and are caught, that they will go to ! They can have some inflatable dolls to play with! Actually, they’re rapists in disguise! Children cannot consent to such abuse!
The pictures of these perverts , actually rapists, are there for all of us to see! I can’t stand to look at these monsters ! There has to be a special hell for them , and I suggest solitary confinement where they can “ love “ themselves till death takes them. Pornography is nothing compared to them!
I have stopped using the word "pedophilia," because this has nothing to do with love. This was THEIR word in the 70s. I have returned to child molester and child sexual abuser.
“Absence of feelings of guilt” most likely means a lack of empathy for humans, and therefore personality disorder which renders them harmful to others, in this case CHILDREN. 🤬 Deviant is the proper term.
It is fascinating. Surprisingly, his attraction is indeed as he describes as I read in literature in the early 2000’s - target sex interest tends to be heterosexual and track with age. I’m gay, my target was always 25 years older (I always felt 25 years older) and male. Pedophiles are where target is before 8-12 or so, ephebophile is 12-16. You can no more shake the young attraction than you can turn a straight person gay. It also has to do in some part with a delusion or fantasy about being that age too.
As with Trans (you can’t change sex) you can’t change age. You also can’t have sex with people who can’t legally make sexual decisions.
It’s a permanent problem and there can never be a solution; by definition these people have an attraction to precisely those who they can never, under any circumstances, have sex with.
It’s like having a sexual attraction to space aliens, people in comas, “50 foot tall women”. The desire cannot be satisfied.
Of course there will always be those who ‘enjoyed’ it. But the fact is they should not have been exposed to it in the first place. A 3 year old might ‘enjoy’ it but it still doesn’t make it right. In civilised societies, we prefer to keep our children protected for as long as possible and punish those who step outside the rule of law. Call it a sexual orientation if you like, but in the majority of countries in the West, it’s still considered a crime.
Horrifying and yet not the least bit surprising. Expanding the LGB moniker to add in the TQ and the all-important "+" at the end, which leaves room for multiple other "identities", was an essential first step in smuggling paedophilia in.
No wonder they had to downgrade the term gay and bring back, but rehabilitate, the term "queer", because, while mimicking acceptable sexual orientation diversity, it covertly embraces an infinite range of dangerous perversions that most gay and straight people abhor.
When you let insanity walk through the door (by pretending that men can be women and that confected "identity" matters more than reality) you leave room for all manner of depravity to follow, all justified by "queer theory".
No, Jenny, the word "queer" is not being popularized in an effort to rehabilitate an expression that is and always has been hate speech labeling gay and lesbian people. For those of us who can remember before 1990, it's up there with The N Word in hate speech. The current purpose is to normalize all sorts of behaviors and confuse the public, a classic move for propaganda. It is, in fact, entirely undefined. It's available to anyone who feels the need for the social cachet of being a member of an "oppressed' group. All you need to do is claim it. I get the impression at least half the NPR staff has done so, to judge from the frequency of stories about "queer" something or other. You might make your claim more vivid by painting your fingernails black or some poisonous green, nothing more required.
Couldn’t agree more, it’s a hateful word, but sadly now heard routinely, while the word gay is very rarely heard. Gay is verging on heretical as far as the gender Taliban are concerned, because it (correctly) assumes the reality of same-sex attraction, as opposed to the absurd concept of same-gender attraction. The gender ideologues seek to erase biological sex, and biological reality in general, hence their love for the term “queer” which is amorphous enough to stretch to fit anything.
I commend you for writing this piece to alert us. It was rather painful to hit the little heart icon, though. I wish there was an icon that denoted feeling nauseous. That is how I actually feel, that and outrage. I cannot fathom this actually being on the table, so to speak, to legitimize in any way.
It is like making rape legal..is that the next step?And then the justification for legalizing rape : “ Women enjoy it” ..as someone on Substack actually said in a post!🤮🤮
flood men with decades of pornography depicting abject violence as erotic and all barriers to the reality of harm get blinded by the grand finale cum shot to women's rights.
How lovely that trans activism has given all these men a home, a community, a uniform, and access to children. Really what we’ll all remember forever.
Thanks for your work Genevieve!!!!
Look on the bright side - they have made it easier to take out all the trash in the same bag when the housecleaning starts.
Yep,I prefer my enemy out in the open,no cover,easy to mark
Thoroughly nauseating and another reason to never ignore the instinct of many women that the whole subject elicits: danger. Perhaps that's part of why erasing actual women and colonising womanhood is so important to these people. Divide and conquer. Make us voiceless and outside of acceptable so that our "dangerous agenda" (ha!) can be easily exterminated.
Hard to read, but essential work-thank you!
It was hard to read all of that! I kept thinking of my beautiful almost 10 year old granddaughter and wishing these people were taken out of circulation and put somewhere where they couldn’t abuse young children! My disgust and hatred of these men has no bounds.
Women are the ultimate protectors of children. We will kill to protect them. This is why they strive to destroy the Woman, the Mother.
Question here, are we assuming the minors are able to consent? Or hear me out, is the goal pf puberty blockers really to create the perpetual child like adult for the “MAPS” or I still like peodos.
Seriously though by normalizing this paraphilia, will children be able to see danger and exploitation? Will child safe quarding be impossible?
These men are exposing themselves(Ha! ) for what they are !why are they not warned that if they engage in their disgusting behavior and are caught, that they will go to ! They can have some inflatable dolls to play with! Actually, they’re rapists in disguise! Children cannot consent to such abuse!
TPE dolls ... way more realistic. And customizable
It’s neither a sexual orientation nor a disorder. It’s a crime!
Exactly! And each of these perverts needs to be taken out of circulation! Jail!
It shouldn’t even be up for discussion!
The pictures of these perverts , actually rapists, are there for all of us to see! I can’t stand to look at these monsters ! There has to be a special hell for them , and I suggest solitary confinement where they can “ love “ themselves till death takes them. Pornography is nothing compared to them!
Unfortunately, most if not all of these sub humanoid deviants need culling. Some animals cannot be rehabilitated and need to be removed from society.
Prison.
Solitary confinement for life? That’s the only way otherwise their poison will infect others that may be imprisoned for lesser crimes.
I’m not a feminist but I am a criminal lawyer.
Shocker! No one in a million years would have guessed it.
thank you once again to you and reddux for your tireless work. you tell it like it is.
I have stopped using the word "pedophilia," because this has nothing to do with love. This was THEIR word in the 70s. I have returned to child molester and child sexual abuser.
I agree!
“Absence of feelings of guilt” most likely means a lack of empathy for humans, and therefore personality disorder which renders them harmful to others, in this case CHILDREN. 🤬 Deviant is the proper term.
Yes, deviant or maybe MinorAttractedPervert!
This is what the entire “trans movement” is about. Why do you think Hollywood is all in?
It’s becoming clearer every day. Literal moving of goal posts to normalize any and all proclivities.
It is fascinating. Surprisingly, his attraction is indeed as he describes as I read in literature in the early 2000’s - target sex interest tends to be heterosexual and track with age. I’m gay, my target was always 25 years older (I always felt 25 years older) and male. Pedophiles are where target is before 8-12 or so, ephebophile is 12-16. You can no more shake the young attraction than you can turn a straight person gay. It also has to do in some part with a delusion or fantasy about being that age too.
As with Trans (you can’t change sex) you can’t change age. You also can’t have sex with people who can’t legally make sexual decisions.
It’s a permanent problem and there can never be a solution; by definition these people have an attraction to precisely those who they can never, under any circumstances, have sex with.
It’s like having a sexual attraction to space aliens, people in comas, “50 foot tall women”. The desire cannot be satisfied.
There is no way to normalize these paraphilias
I’m shocked.
Me three. Same feeling I get when I stick a fork in a toaster.
Of course there will always be those who ‘enjoyed’ it. But the fact is they should not have been exposed to it in the first place. A 3 year old might ‘enjoy’ it but it still doesn’t make it right. In civilised societies, we prefer to keep our children protected for as long as possible and punish those who step outside the rule of law. Call it a sexual orientation if you like, but in the majority of countries in the West, it’s still considered a crime.
It's a crime - until it's not (which is their central goal).
Laws are no substitute for ethics.