A trans-identified male residing in Vernon, British Columbia, has been given sympathetic coverage by the press after two teenage girls reported that he had exposed his genitals in their presence while using the women’s change room of a local recreation center. Amanda Wilson, 67, whose given name has not been reported, was accused of stripping nude in the presence of two 14 year-old girls at the Vernon Aquatic Center on January 27.
“It makes me feel like a second-class woman,” Wilson said - Nope, you're not a second-class woman at all, you are in fact a man. It is absolute narcissism to think that your rights take precedence over the rights and safety of others. Those 14 year old teens were clearly uncomfortable but let's prioritise the 6'2" male and dismiss their need for feeling safe in a space where they need to change.
The fact is this man, even after castration, is still a man. It would be honest to refer to him as a eunuch. Calling him a woman is dishonest. Biology matters.
So the shock and fear of 14 year-old girls at seeing a naked, overweight, elderly 6'2" "very male" male in their changing room should be discounted, due to uncertainty about the state of his genitals?
Intimidation of women and children by men is a power play enabled in this case by the legal fiction that this man is a "woman".
In mentioning that he'd been beaten as a child by his father, he's also making full use of an extra excuse to take revenge on children for his father's behaviour.
Flashing -- by men with intact genitals -- is now taken much more seriously as a warning of probable escalation to future sexual assault. (And this naked man's apparent lack of genitals might be shocking in itself, to an observer of any age.)
His intimidation of 14 year-old girls should be taken as a warning of future more serious assault.
As I've told my trans widow story, of discovering my husband had a secret crossdressing life when our sons were 1 and 4, then went through a harrowing and financially crushing divorce, I've often mentioned the whippings his father dealt to him. Spanking is a pseudo-sexual act, especially when the spanker takes the child's pants down. The malpractice of the entire mental health field comes clear as more of these psychiatrically ill men reveal their childhoods, along with their fetish. Thanks for bringing these repulsive but illuminating stories out, Genevieve!
A man who exposes himself is a criminal in normal times, and he would be in jail except for those warped politicians and their voters who are titillated by passing laws to allow deviant criminals to do whatever they want, like the criminal doctors and surgeons injecting and cutting up children. I believe "trans" has exposed criminally bent people who live normally in society but have now found an outlet to mess with other people by promoting "trans" and voting for politicians who will pass laws to allow criminals to run rampant in society, while they watch and enjoy the show. The deviant internet sites were not enough for the voyeurs, they wanted to see this deviance functioning in daily life.
What a sick, sick man. I cannot wait for the day that all of this wrong-headed legislation is finally repealed across the West and these men are required to get the psychiatric help they truly need.
Well said, thank you , but I am a absolutists, I know an unpopular stance. This one issue is the only one that there can not be blurring of the lines and that is the biology, sex matters, the impossibility of transing into anything. All other political, moral etc issues I can generally see both sides.
Amusingly, the originally article was careful not to include a picture of 'A-man-da'. However, it did include cropped photos of Lia Thomas in a desperate attempt to make him look feminine. Can't wait for the day when this whole house of cards tumbles down.
So, the comment about him being a "second class woman" is ridiculous. And the photos are weird, although I think maybe we need more info to really judge his intent there. But, honestly, the fact that he apparently doesn't have a penis is pretty compelling in this case. What, exactly, were these teens "exposed" to that made them so uncomfortable? Now, I'm not saying in any way that the cosmetic procedures used in transition surgery make real genitals. However, if a man's penis and testes have been removed, he has no male genitals to expose. He doesn't have female genitals, but he doesn't have male ones anymore either. And I do 100% believe that there have been some cases where people have seen a trans person in a locker room or bathroom and saw a political opportunity or perhaps just an opportunity to get attention and be the victim and they report something that didn't really happen, or didn't happen that way at all. In this political climate, we can't make the mistake of assuming that every single report of trans indecent exposure is credible. In this case, I think we need more information before deciding. The fact that he posts digitally altered photos of his face and neck, obviously fully clothed, is weird but not particularly relevant to the credibility of this accusation. Jumping on every accusation without vetting it does no favors to any cause. I'd actually really like to see the teens or the uncle respond to Wilson's claims about his anatomy, and I would like to know more about exactly what he did to make them so uncomfortable.
Also, assuming that sexual assault survivors will freak out at the sight of any naked man is ridiculous. There are thousands of survivors who work in medical fields or other areas where they see naked men up close all the time. Yes, some survivors, especially right after the assault, may find the sight of a penis to be traumatic. But the majority do not, or they are able to overcome that reaction with time. There are thousands of heterosexual survivors who are able to have active sex lives. Point being, context matters greatly here. A naked man is not traumatic for me-what is traumatic is anyone, in any state of dress, who approaches or especially who touches me in an aggressive or overpowering manner. Rape is not traumatic because of the sex itself, rape is traumatic because of the power, control and aggression used in the sexual act. So, the biggest triggers for most survivors include highly individualized reminders of the attack (certain colors, sounds, smells... Reminders of the setting or of individual traits of the attacker), and displays of aggression or threatening behavior. Please don't paint all survivors with a blanket statement that they cannot ever be exposed to male genetalia again. It's ridiculous and untrue and ignores the dynamics of an assault situation.
“It makes me feel like a second-class woman,” Wilson said - Nope, you're not a second-class woman at all, you are in fact a man. It is absolute narcissism to think that your rights take precedence over the rights and safety of others. Those 14 year old teens were clearly uncomfortable but let's prioritise the 6'2" male and dismiss their need for feeling safe in a space where they need to change.
The fact is this man, even after castration, is still a man. It would be honest to refer to him as a eunuch. Calling him a woman is dishonest. Biology matters.
So the shock and fear of 14 year-old girls at seeing a naked, overweight, elderly 6'2" "very male" male in their changing room should be discounted, due to uncertainty about the state of his genitals?
Intimidation of women and children by men is a power play enabled in this case by the legal fiction that this man is a "woman".
In mentioning that he'd been beaten as a child by his father, he's also making full use of an extra excuse to take revenge on children for his father's behaviour.
Flashing -- by men with intact genitals -- is now taken much more seriously as a warning of probable escalation to future sexual assault. (And this naked man's apparent lack of genitals might be shocking in itself, to an observer of any age.)
His intimidation of 14 year-old girls should be taken as a warning of future more serious assault.
As I've told my trans widow story, of discovering my husband had a secret crossdressing life when our sons were 1 and 4, then went through a harrowing and financially crushing divorce, I've often mentioned the whippings his father dealt to him. Spanking is a pseudo-sexual act, especially when the spanker takes the child's pants down. The malpractice of the entire mental health field comes clear as more of these psychiatrically ill men reveal their childhoods, along with their fetish. Thanks for bringing these repulsive but illuminating stories out, Genevieve!
A man who exposes himself is a criminal in normal times, and he would be in jail except for those warped politicians and their voters who are titillated by passing laws to allow deviant criminals to do whatever they want, like the criminal doctors and surgeons injecting and cutting up children. I believe "trans" has exposed criminally bent people who live normally in society but have now found an outlet to mess with other people by promoting "trans" and voting for politicians who will pass laws to allow criminals to run rampant in society, while they watch and enjoy the show. The deviant internet sites were not enough for the voyeurs, they wanted to see this deviance functioning in daily life.
What a sick, sick man. I cannot wait for the day that all of this wrong-headed legislation is finally repealed across the West and these men are required to get the psychiatric help they truly need.
Our daughters deserve so much better than this.
"God made a mistake, stupid God"
It's a cult
Well said, thank you , but I am a absolutists, I know an unpopular stance. This one issue is the only one that there can not be blurring of the lines and that is the biology, sex matters, the impossibility of transing into anything. All other political, moral etc issues I can generally see both sides.
Amusingly, the originally article was careful not to include a picture of 'A-man-da'. However, it did include cropped photos of Lia Thomas in a desperate attempt to make him look feminine. Can't wait for the day when this whole house of cards tumbles down.
https://bnnbreaking.com/society/a-bridge-between-misunderstanding-and-acceptance-amanda-wilsons-story
So, the comment about him being a "second class woman" is ridiculous. And the photos are weird, although I think maybe we need more info to really judge his intent there. But, honestly, the fact that he apparently doesn't have a penis is pretty compelling in this case. What, exactly, were these teens "exposed" to that made them so uncomfortable? Now, I'm not saying in any way that the cosmetic procedures used in transition surgery make real genitals. However, if a man's penis and testes have been removed, he has no male genitals to expose. He doesn't have female genitals, but he doesn't have male ones anymore either. And I do 100% believe that there have been some cases where people have seen a trans person in a locker room or bathroom and saw a political opportunity or perhaps just an opportunity to get attention and be the victim and they report something that didn't really happen, or didn't happen that way at all. In this political climate, we can't make the mistake of assuming that every single report of trans indecent exposure is credible. In this case, I think we need more information before deciding. The fact that he posts digitally altered photos of his face and neck, obviously fully clothed, is weird but not particularly relevant to the credibility of this accusation. Jumping on every accusation without vetting it does no favors to any cause. I'd actually really like to see the teens or the uncle respond to Wilson's claims about his anatomy, and I would like to know more about exactly what he did to make them so uncomfortable.
Also, assuming that sexual assault survivors will freak out at the sight of any naked man is ridiculous. There are thousands of survivors who work in medical fields or other areas where they see naked men up close all the time. Yes, some survivors, especially right after the assault, may find the sight of a penis to be traumatic. But the majority do not, or they are able to overcome that reaction with time. There are thousands of heterosexual survivors who are able to have active sex lives. Point being, context matters greatly here. A naked man is not traumatic for me-what is traumatic is anyone, in any state of dress, who approaches or especially who touches me in an aggressive or overpowering manner. Rape is not traumatic because of the sex itself, rape is traumatic because of the power, control and aggression used in the sexual act. So, the biggest triggers for most survivors include highly individualized reminders of the attack (certain colors, sounds, smells... Reminders of the setting or of individual traits of the attacker), and displays of aggression or threatening behavior. Please don't paint all survivors with a blanket statement that they cannot ever be exposed to male genetalia again. It's ridiculous and untrue and ignores the dynamics of an assault situation.
🤮🤮🤮